I attended the presentation State Representative and House Majority Whip Barry Fleming made on Monday evening to the Clarke County Republican Committee concerning the GREAT Plan (a.k.a the ”Glenn tax”).
This was my first opportunity to chat with Fleming; I found him to be a personable and inquisitive sort. He carried off his presentation well, making some valid points in favor of
Even so, I find myself ambivalent about the plan. On the one hand, it appeals to me by virtue of being a consumption tax, which I find far more philosophically palatable than either income or property taxes. On the other hand, I am aware of some potential shortcomings of the plan, such as those brought up by my frequent partner in crime, John Marsh. He has serious concerns that fiddling with the particular method of tax collection will not affect the real problem inherent in governmental budgeting, namely the continued growth in spending. From an accountability standpoint, he also thinks it a bad idea to “decouple” those collecting the taxes (the state) from those spending them (local governments and school boards). Also, he thinks that taxing business to business transactions could put
As one who has been a keen observer of government financing at the local and state levels, I think that John effectively counters some of the hype attached to the GREAT Plan. I fully support an overhaul of the state’s tax system, but remain to be convinced that this particular approach shold be it.
No comments:
Post a Comment