Friday, December 17, 2010

The Mendoza Line

With yesterday’s decision by the Georgia Supreme Court not to reconsider its recent Nuçi’s Space verdict, the years-long ordeal was finally laid to rest.  For the coverage of the decision in the Banner-Herald, see here and here (and for my superb complete history of the issue from last month, see here).  The online commentary to the local newspaper’s stories reveals two separate issues. 


The first issue, the one of the most concern to me, deals with the law as it is currently written.  I always thought that the legal aspects of this case were a slam dunk.  The Board of Tax Assessors lost at the level of the Board of Equalization, lost at the level of the Clarke County Superior Court, and lost at the level of the Georgia Supreme Court (twice, once by a verdict and once by a refusal to reconsider).  Its only victory came at the level of the Georgia Appeals Court.  Thus, the Unified Government went 1 for 5 in this case, thereby achieving baseball’s storied Mendoza Line for futility.

This is just the latest in long series of legal debacles for which we local taxpayers have footed the bill: the rental registration/rental regulation case; the attempted Hospital Authority takeover case; the eastside park land condemnation case; the “empty chair” property tax assessment case, the stoplight camera case; etc.  I trust that the incoming administration down at City Hall has taken note.

The second issue, the one that seems to have generated the most online commentary, is whether the law as written is a good one.  Perhaps it is and perhaps it is not.  Regardless, the proper venue for that debate is under the Gold Dome, not in the courts.

Sphere: Related Content

Tuesday, December 14, 2010

Clarke County GOP Christmas Party Wrap

Many of the local Republican faithful – and there may well be more of us that you think in the Classic City – braved the cold and gathered at the Country Inn & Suites last night for our annual Christmas Party.


Newly elected Georgia Secretary of State Brain Kemp pressed the flesh.  No surprise there; Brian is an all-around good guy who attends whatever local functions that his schedule allows.

Mayor-elect Nancy Denson made the rounds.  No surprise there, either; Denson reached out to us GOP types during her campaign (not to mention those increasingly few moderate, centrist Democrats who remain in Athens).  I chatted briefly with her.  For her part, she complemented my recent letter to the editor about the CCSD’s per pupil expenditures.  For my part, I told here that while we (and by that I meant both me individually and the local GOP generally) would agree on some issues and disagree on others, we Republicans would be happy just to have someone down at City Hall who listened to what we have to say, as that has not been the case for the past several years.

Finally, Doug McKillip of the 115th, the GOP’s newest member of the Georgia House of Representatives, was in attendance.  I had wondered if he would make an appearance, and sure enough he did.  For his part, it was a good political move if nothing else.  For my part, I welcomed him over to the Dark Side.  I wrote some pretty harsh things about McKillip’s sudden political conversion over on the Banner-Herald comment boards and still think that it is up to McKillip to prove me wrong, but we shall see.

Sphere: Related Content

Wednesday, December 8, 2010

Fire Station No. 6 Update (yes, again)

Seems that yesterday's announcement of the reopening of Fire Station No. 6 may have been a bit premature.  Said the Banner-Herald's article:

Station 6 now is fully staffed, with five firefighters per shift, and Engine 26 and a tanker truck in the bay.

The A shift was the first to move into the station Friday, with the B and C shifts following on subsequent days.

I happened to drive through the intersection of Olympic and Athena Drives about noon today; there were no signs of life whatsoever at the station, no engine or tanker truck anywhere to be seen, and only two vehicles in the parking lot where one would expect on-duty firefighters to park (a sedan and a pickup truck).

But, after some twenty-one months, what is a couple of days more?

Sphere: Related Content

CCSD FY 2010 Per Pupil Expenditures

Per pupil expenditure figures are now available from the Georgia Department of Education for FY 2010.*  According to those figures, the State of Georgia average for per pupil expenditures this past fiscal year was $8759.77, a decrease of 1.66% from the FY 2009 figure of $8907.82. Conversely, the corresponding FY 2010 figure for the Clarke County School District was $11,360.09, slightly more than a 0.99% increase over the FY 2009 figure of $11,248.22. Thus, our local average per pupil expenditures rose from 26.27% above the state average in FY 2009 to 29.68% above the state average in FY 2010.  And note that the per pupil expenditure figure indicated on the CCSD web site is now two full fiscal years out of date.

A look inside the FY 2010 figures reveals the following per pupil expenditures for the Clarke County School District in the seven categories tracked by the Georgia Department of Education:


Instruction $7522.51 (plus 27.27% of the state average of $5910.84)

Pupil Services $368.19 (plus 22.25% of the state average of $301.18)


Staff Services $771.83 (plus 65.77% of the state average of $465.60)


General Administration $461.18 (plus 1.72% of the state average of $453.38)

School Administration $624.40 (plus 13.18% of the state average of $551.70)

Transportation $657.63 (plus 66.71% of the state average of $394.48)

Maintenance & Operations $954.36 (plus 39.81% of the state average of $682.61)


The category of General Administration is pretty much a wash, but in every other category the CCSD outspends the state average by considerable, and in couple of cases astonishing, margins.

According to my reckoning, this high level of per pupil expenditures places the District in the 94th percentile (93.89) among school systems statewide, eleventh highest of the 180 school systems reporting, a ranking that has not varied appreciably over the last several years. Of the ten school districts that had higher per pupil spending in FY 2010, nine are much smaller districts that have to spread fixed capital and administrative costs over far fewer students, thereby driving their per pupil expenditures up due to a lack of economies of scale. As in the past, the only school district with more students that outspends Clarke County on a per pupil basis is that of the City of Atlanta.

By way of comparison, FY 2010 per pupil expenditures of the school districts that surround Clarke County were:


Barrow County $7804.32


Commerce City $8687.39


Jackson County $8878.20


Jefferson City $7169.85

Madison County $8803.75


Oconee County $8547.30 

Oglethorpe County $8555.99

So, even as our neighboring school systems, and those around the state, are managing to hold the line on spending, here in Clarke County our spending increases continue apace.  Not by much, perhaps, by any increase over the already stratospheric level of expenditures to which we are accustomed gives lie to the incessant claims of paucity made by the CCSD.

Let the dissembling begin.

*As an aside, I contacted the Financial Review folks over at the DOE in early October to ask politely when the figures for FY 2010 would be posted on their web site (a query to which I never received any response); I again contacted them in early November with the same question (another query to which I never received any response).  And so it goes.  All percentage and percentile calculations are my own.

Sphere: Related Content

Tuesday, December 7, 2010

Fire Station No. 6 Update

More than twenty-one months after its closure due to damage caused by a snowstorm, Fire Station No. 6 is operational again.  Yes, it is a nice station and I am glad that it has finally reopened

However, the fact remains that the Unified Government wasted 15 months trying to get an ARRA "economic stimulus" grant so as to rebuild the station (in its entirety) to a standard comparable to its newest elaborately overbuilt "suburban" stations. In the event, the station was rebuilt with the same funds City Hall could have used 15 months earlier without the grant.

I did not support the ARRA. But for anyone who did, the denial of this grant reveals just what a scam it was; you would be hard pressed to find a more "shovel-ready" project than this one, as City Hall already had the land (the present location of Fire Station No. 6), the plans (from Fire Station No. 9), and an immediate need.

Of course, getting the grant would not have constituted "economic stimulus" in any meaningful manner - but that is an argument for another day.

Also, of course, my argument was never with the rank and file firefighters who staffed Fire Station No. 6, but with the higher-ups who determined policy.

Sphere: Related Content

Friday, December 3, 2010

Impertinent Observations (post election edition)

I cast an unenthusiastic vote for Nancy Denson in the mayoral runoff, having voted for Charlie Maddox in the general election.  Back when John March and I caught the Clarke County School District blatantly breaking the Taxpayer Bill of Rights, Denson buried her head in the sand – just like everyone else – and denied that any problem existed (even though she was presented with chapter and verse of how and why what the CCSD did was in obvious violation of state law and Department of Revenue regulations; it was her responsibility as tax commissioner to verify that all of the legalities were observed before signing off on the property tax digest for the year).  Even so, I found the prospect of a Denson administration preferable to that of another four years of Gwen O’Looney.  We who live in the “general services” district knew exactly what to expect from the former mayor from her two previous terms.  As an aside, Denson is the first winning candidate for mayor or commission that I have voted for in this century (and may well be the last).

Now the Athens Downtown Development Authority wants funding to come up with a “master plan” for downtown.  Apparently, the exiting planning department, zoning ordinances, (much hallowed) land use plan, and historical district regulations are insufficient to guide the development of the downtown area.  It seems that we need even more bureaucracy, regulation, and expense to get anything done.  And people wonder why businesses are reluctant to expand or locate here?

Wednesday marked twenty one full months since the closing of Fire Station No. 6, about which I have commented regularly and at great length.  Though construction appears to be finished, we residents in District 1 still have no word from the Unified Government as to when we may expect the station to be operational again.

Sphere: Related Content

Thursday, November 18, 2010

Impertinent Observations

On the agenda for next month’s Commission voting session is a measure creating an Athens Cultural Affairs Commission.  A couple of provisions that will have the net effect of driving up costs for the taxpayer are of particular interest to me:

Sec. 1-25-5. Funding for Public Art Program
Upon adoption of the annual General Capital Budget, the Mayor and Commission of the Unified Government shall appropriate one percent of the value of all approved projects in the Capital Budget excluding land purchases, leases, finance cost, and projects categorized as “Equipment”, to the Public Art Project Account. This account shall be a multi-year account used for the design, fabrication, installation, maintenance and implementation of community public art projects recommended by the ACAC and approved by the Mayor and Commission. In addition to the above noted capital funding for public art, the ACAC may submit to the Unified Government an annual operating budget request to further support its ongoing efforts to promote a public art program and other cultural community initiatives.

Sec. 1-25-6. Additional Funding for Public Art.
The Mayor and Commission shall identify projects within all Special Purpose Local Option Sales Tax programs, beginning with the SPLOST 2011 program, that are appropriate for the inclusion of public art elements as integral parts of the project construction and appropriate not less than one percent of the project’s actual construction contract for the purpose of funding public art elements for those specific projects. The public art appropriation shall be maintained as a separate item in the project budget. The ACAC shall assist the Unified Government in the selection, development and implementation of these art projects as noted in Sec. 1-25-4.

Congratulations to the Western Circuit’s Steve Jones on his appointment to a Northern Circuit of Georgia federal judgeship.  Though we have met a few times, I really do not know him in any meaningful sense – but his reputation is an enviable one.  I wish him well.

I still think that the overriding consideration in anything John Barrow does is staying in office – period – no matter to whom he has to sell his soul.

Sphere: Related Content

Wednesday, November 17, 2010

Judicial and Legislative Aspects of the Nuçi’s Space Case (and why it is important)

The recent Georgia Supreme Court decision confirming the tax exempt status of the Nuçi’s Space property is but the latest chapter in a story that stretches back almost four decades.  Interestingly, most of the judicial and legislative action over that period originated right here in Athens-Clarke County, a point to which I will return later.

Back in the early 1970s, tax officials up in Rabun County sought to tax the property of a private school that generated revenue through its ancillary dairy operations.  Generally speaking, property owned by educational institutions is exempt from property taxes, but in its November, 1971 decision, Rabun Gap-Nacoochee School v. Thomas et al; and vice versa, the Georgia Supreme Court ruled that if the property was used to generate revenue, even if such revenue was used entirely for charitable purposes, the property was subject to taxation.  Note, though, that collection of the tax by the county government was optional, not mandatory.

Fast forward to 2003, the year in which tax officials here in the Classic City discovered the Supreme Court’s decision from decades earlier.  Upon reapplying for its previously held tax exemption after moving the location of its thrift store, Habitat for Humanity subsequently received a property tax bill on the new location.  Property tax bills for the Salvation Army on its thrift store and Athens Christian School on a couple of houses that it rented to faculty members quickly followed (in the event, property tax was eventually collected on church parking lots, concession stands at Sanford Stadium and Stegemen Coliseum, and the UGA Bookstore according to their income producing activities).  Needless to say, the property tax bills concerning the two thrift stores prompted appeals to the Board of Assessors and then the Board of Equalization.  Both bodies denied the appeals, being perfectly justified in so doing under existing case law.

During the following year, 2004, the matter shifted from the judicial arena to the legislative one. Louise McBee, a longtime member of the Georgia House of Representatives from Athens, got the ball rolling by asking the House’s legislative counsel to draft legislation that would exempt the kind of property in question from property taxes.  McBee retired from office before such a bill could be introduced into the House.

Upon succeeding McBee in the 2005-2006 legislative session, Jane Kidd introduced HB 370.  This measure, which had five cosponsors (including local GOP pariah Bob Smith but notably absent local Democrat Keith Heard), “relating to property exempt from ad valorem taxation, so as to provide for an exemption for certain charitable institutions” and further “to provide for a referendum” on the matter.  Kidd’s bill began the legislative and committee processes in the House in February, 2005 but never emerged from the Ways and Means Committee.

Undaunted, Kidd revisited the matter in the form of HB1388 in February, 2006.  This time, the bill had two cosponsors (again including Bob Smith but not Keith Heard).  The bill emerged from the legislative process on this second attempt and resulted in Referendum C, a constitutional amendment item on the general election ballot of November, 2006.  The statewide measure passed by an electoral margin of 68.5% to 31.5%.

It is only at this point that Nuçi’s Space enters the discussion, as under the 2006 amendment to the Constitution of the State of Georgia its location would have been exempt form property taxes.  The Nuçi Phillips Memorial Foundation, Inc., owner of the property, applied for the exemption at its first opportunity in 2007.  However, the Athens-Clarke County Board of Tax Assessors claimed that, since the Foundation sold alcoholic beverages for consumption on the premises, rented out space for private functions, rented out rehearsal space, and sold musical supplies it forfeited any claim to an exemption from property taxes.

Needless to say, the Foundation claimed that the location was, in fact, exempt from property taxes and appealed the matter to the Athens-Clarke County Board of Tax Equalization, a citizen panel appointed to resolve such disputes.  In the event, the Board of Tax Equalization ruled in favor of the Foundation.

The Board of Tax Assessors in turn appealed this ruling to the Superior Court of Athens-Clarke County.  Both parties stipulated a non-jury trial and Chief Judge Lawton Stephens heard the case in October, 2008.  In December of that year, Stephens issued his ruling in the case Athens-Clarke County Board of Tax Assessors v. Nuçi Philips Memorial Foundation, Inc. in favor of the latter, noting that:

By a preponderance of the evidence presented at the trial the Court finds that the Foundation has met the test for exemption as articulated by the Supreme Court of Georgia . . . The Foundation has proven by a preponderance of evidence that it is an institution devoted entirely to charitable pursuits, that the charitable pursuits of the Foundation are for the benefit of the public, and that the use of the property is exclusively devoted to those charitable pursuits.

And:

All funds collected by the Foundation directly support the programs, services, and mission of the Foundation.

And:

The Court finds that Nuçi Phillips Memorial Foundation, Inc. continues to operate as a purely public charity and has not deviated from the original purpose and vision of its founder Linda Phillips to honor the memory of her late son.

Not content with that outcome, the Board of Tax Assessors pursued matter up the judicial ladder.  In November, 2009 a three-judge panel of the Court of Appeals of Georgia reversed the Superior Court’s decision in Athens-Clarke County Board of Tax Assessors vs. Nuçi Phillips Memorial Foundation, Inc., noting that:

In support of its argument, the board points to undisputed record evidence demonstrating that the foundation rented space to individuals hosting birthday parties and wedding receptions.  The foundation also rented rehearsal space.  Based upon this undisputed evidence, the foundation cannot demonstrate that its property was “exclusively devoted to conduct that benefits the public by furthering the charitable pursuits of its owner.” (Emphasis supplied.) . . . An organization does not dispense purely public charity when a person obtains its services by paying a fee.

The Court based its opinion on the contention that even if the revenue generated by Nuçi’s Space went toward fulfilling its charitable purpose, the mere act of generating such revenue disqualified it from a property tax exemption, citing the requirements of O.C.G.A. 48-5-41(d)(2).

Unsurprisingly, the Foundation differed with the logic used in the appellate ruling and took the matter to the Georgia Supreme Court.  Earlier this month, the high court overturned the appellate court, saying in the case of Nuçi Phillips Memorial Foundation v. Athens-Clarke County Board of Tax Assessors that:

The Foundation is not disqualified from the tax exemption under the restrictions in OCGA § 48-5-41(c) and (d) (1). The institution issues no stock, makes no profit, does not distribute any dividends or any income to members, accumulates no retained earnings, and has a Board of Directors whose members serve without compensation. Although the organization periodically rents out part of its building to third parties, the primary purpose of the building is not to raise income but to provide services for those seeking mental health assistance. Any income raised is incidental to the primary use of the property, and the purpose of raising the income is to help fund the organization’s charitable services, including the payment for direct professional therapy for those who cannot afford it.

So there you have it.  Where we may go from here has yet to be determined.  The Board of Tax Assessors, and by that I mean the Unified Government of Athens-Clarke County because the mayor and commission can bring this process to a halt at any time of their choosing, continue to debate the wisdom of further beating this dead horse.

So, other than as an academic exercise into the history and specifics of the Nuçi’s Space case, why does this matter?  It matters because this expensive and drawn out process demonstrates the lengths to which government – and in fairness, I do not mean just the folks down at City Hall – will go to generate revenue.  Since Athens-Clarke County officials discovered the case from Rabun County, this entire matter, be it in the state legislature or in the courts, has hinged on nothing but the fact that the Unified Government has consistently sought more revenue, going a mere one for four in the appeals and judicial proceedings assiocited with its quest.

I have maintained for years, in print, in person, and in the blogosphere that government, be it local, state, or national, suffers not from a revenue problem; it instead suffers from a spending problem.

The Unified Government of Athens-Clarke County will be desperate for revenue going forward, revenue to offset its spending problem.  The Feds have already shot their stimulus bolt, failing miserably (and predictably), so don’t look to Washington for more financial largess.  Similarly, the folks under the Gold Dome are not in a position to bail local governments out anymore, as evidenced by the discontinuance of Homeowner Tax Relief Grant back in 2009.

Instead, it will be up to the folks down at City Hall to fund their own spending.  They will do so through increased property tax assessments (remember the claim that every piece of property in the county is reevaluated every year), millage rate increases, never-ending LOST, never-ending SPLOST, increased water fees, increased sewer fees, increased trash pickup fees, increased landfill fees, imposition of the stormwater utility fee, a proposed increase in the hotel/motel tax, a proposed plastic shopping bag tax, a proposed trash hauler fee, a proposed septic tank inspection fee, a hoped-for tax on Internet sales, a hoped-for expansion of the existing sales tax to more items, etcetera, etcetera.  That – and that alone – is what the Nuçi’s Space brouhaha is all about.

For those interested, coverage of these matters over the years in the Banner-Herald, can be found here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, and here.

Sphere: Related Content

Monday, November 15, 2010

SPLOST 2011 Claim Busted

Some of my many concerns about the recent SPLOST 2011 ballot resolution revolved around the claim that half of the levy’s revenue would be paid by visitors to our fair community.  Conspicuously absent from this claim, as I and others pointed out, was any documentation or citation as to the origin of the claim, in what manner it was determined, or the definition of “visitors.”
                                       
Interestingly, rather than actually provide any documentation for the claim, supporters of SPLOST 2011 usually retorted, insofar as any attribution was made at all, that the source of the claim was John Culpepper, Director of the Unified Government’s Finance Department.  I write “interestingly” because none of the material supporting passage of the ballot resolution (direct mailings, web site, news articles, etc.) made any such reference.  Critics of the claim only had the word of its supporters that this was the case.  In fact, those supporters went so far as to declare validation of the claim due to the fact that critics could not disprove it. This, of course, constituted logical nonsense (and, in my opinion, tacit acknowledgment that the claim was fundamentally unverifiable – whether supporters realized it or not); how can a claim be disproved if no documentation or source is given for it and why should the responsibility of validating such a claim fall to its critics rather than to its supporters?  Of course, it cannot and it should not.

A few days before the election, I threw down the newsprint equivalent of a gauntlet to supporters of the SPLOST 2011 ballot resolution, in which I stated bluntly:

Whether it is in news articles, letters to the editor, on the SPLOST 2011 website or in the printed campaign material delivered to my door, absolutely no corroboration or documentation is given to substantiate the claim that half of the tax will be paid by those who do not live here - none whatsoever. The claim is simply presented as axiomatic and beyond question. I have serious doubts.

By way of response, no one from the SPLOST 2011 citizens committee, no one from the ACC SPLOST 2011 ballot committee, and no one from the Unified Government’s Finance Department offered any rebuttal whatsoever (not that I expected any from the latter, for the simple fact that I had no belief that it was involved in the calim).  The only “proof” offered was vague, secondhand (or third-hand or fourth-hand) references to Mr. Culpepper on the comment boards of the Banner-Herald.

So, even though it was not incumbent on me as a critic of the claim to validate anything, on 05 November I went above and beyond my due diligence and posted the letter below to Mr. Culpepper:

Mr. Culpepper

Though I realize this exercise may seem a bit tedious I ask your forbearance, as I think that my request serves a legitimate public policy interest.

The ACC SLOST 2011 ballot committee, in radio advertisements, in direct mail literature, and on its web site, made the claim that “visitors will pay for half of SPLOST 2011.”  This claim was similarly repeated by supporters of the resolution in various news articles, letters to the editor, online comment boards, and blog posts.

My concern stems from the fact that no documentation as to the source or accuracy of this claim was cited.  I did hear from a member of the SPLOST 2011 citizens committee on WGAU 1340’s Newsmakers that the claim that half of the levy’s revenue will be paid by those who do not live here came from “estimates we got from city-county government” – a verbatim quote – with the estimate given that 45-50% of the levy would be paid by “visitors.”

It stands to reason that the Unified Government’s Finance Department is the source of these estimates.  That being the case, I would appreciate your responses to the following questions.

  • What statistics (population figures, sales tax revenue, etc.) were used to generate the estimates?

  • What is the source(s) of these statistics?

  • What method(s) of calculation were used?

  • What assumptions were used in these calculations?

  • How is the term “visitors” defined?

In other words, I am asking that you walk me through the process of how the 45-50% estimate was determined, with as much specificity as is reasonably possible.

Please understand that I am attaching no opprobrium to anyone and am not calling the integrity of either you or your Department into question.  I am merely seeking this information for my own edification and for whatever contribution I may make to the discussion of local public policy.

Besides which, the issue will continue to be of interest, as the same question will undoubtedly arise next year when the Clarke County School District begins the process of renewing its own SPLOST program.

Your assistance in this matter is greatly appreciated.

Cordially

James Garland

Mr. Culpepper’s response, the promptness, succinctness, and honesty of which earn him high marks, arrived in my mailbox on 13 November.  The body of the letter read, in its entirety:

Dear Mr. Garland

The Finance department did not generate this information.  The Chair of the SPLOST 2011 Committee should be contacted about referendum campaign issues.

Sincerely

John Culpepper
Finance Director

So there you have it . . . in writing . . . on Finance Department letterhead . . . over the signature of Mr. Culpepper himself.  The claims that he or the Finance Department provided the basis of the claim, ubiquitous in the materials and advertisements in support of the SPLOST 2011 ballot resolution, that half of the levy’s revenue would be provided by “visitors” – however that term may be defined – is totally and completely specious.  Just as many of we critics believed it to be from the outset.

Thus, it is time for the proponents of SPLOST 2011 – and their myriad anonymous and pseudonymous sycophants – to come clean and admit that the claim has no justification.  And please note that my intent is not merely to re-fight the last war, as the Clarke County School District has already begun its push to extend the collection of its own version of SPLOST, and it will undoubtedly employ this same unfounded argument.

Sphere: Related Content

SCHS Pigskin Finale

The season for my alma mater Indians came to a close last Friday with a 63-20 loss to the Carrollton Trojans in the first round of the AAA state playoffs at The Reservation in Toccoa.  With the defeat, SCHS finished the season at 8-3, a decided improvement over last year’s uncharacteristically poor 3-7 mark.

Up next for Carrollton (11-0) is the St. Pius X Golden Lions (9-2), the third seed from 5AAA.

Sphere: Related Content